Ireland vs Kiribati: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Ireland
- Kiribati
How they compare
Ireland currently reports 42.6% against 27.1% in Kiribati, a difference of 15.5%.
That makes Ireland's figure about 1.6 times Kiribati's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Kiribati ahead.
Ireland ranks 3rd and Kiribati ranks 5th of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ireland averaged higher in 1 and Kiribati in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -9.5% | 2.5% | 11.9% | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 20.6% | 7.9% | 12.7% | Ireland |
| 2020s | -13.7% | 21.5% | 35.3% | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Ireland or Kiribati?
- Ireland, at 42.6% against 27.1% in Kiribati as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Ireland and Kiribati?
- 15.5%, with Ireland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Kiribati?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do Ireland and Kiribati rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Ireland ranks 3rd and Kiribati ranks 5th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Gross fixed capital formation (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.