IDA total vs Kiribati: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- IDA total
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 27.1% against 5.2% in IDA total, a difference of 21.9%.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 5.2 times IDA total's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2007 it was IDA total ahead.
IDA total ranks 5th and Kiribati ranks 5th of 33 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, IDA total averaged higher in 1 and Kiribati in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IDA total | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.2% | 2.5% | 3.7% | IDA total |
| 2010s | 6.8% | 7.9% | 1.0% | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 4.4% | 21.5% | 17.1% | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, IDA total or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at 27.1% against 5.2% in IDA total as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between IDA total and Kiribati?
- 21.9%, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA total and Kiribati?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do IDA total and Kiribati rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- IDA total ranks 5th and Kiribati ranks 5th of 33 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Gross fixed capital formation (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.