Equatorial Guinea vs Mexico: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports -6.3% against -10.7% in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 4.4%.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 159th and Mexico ranks 156th of 166 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Mexico in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.0% | 2.8% | 26.2% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | -14.5% | 1.8% | 16.3% | Mexico |
| 2020s | -5.0% | 2.0% | 7.0% | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Equatorial Guinea or Mexico?
- Mexico, at -6.3% against -10.7% in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Equatorial Guinea and Mexico?
- 4.4%, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Mexico?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Mexico rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 159th and Mexico ranks 156th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Gross fixed capital formation (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.