El Salvador vs Kyrgyzstan: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- El Salvador
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 22.6% against 21.1% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 1.5%.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2011 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 7th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th of 167 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.4% | 9.5% | 5.1% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 10.2% | 11.2% | 0.9% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, El Salvador or Kyrgyzstan?
- El Salvador, at 22.6% against 21.1% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between El Salvador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1.5%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
- How do El Salvador and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- El Salvador ranks 7th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Gross fixed capital formation (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.