Denmark vs Dominican Republic: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Denmark
- Dominican Republic
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports -3.0% against -3.5% in Denmark, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 33 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1967 it was Denmark ahead.
Denmark ranks 148th and Dominican Republic ranks 145th of 167 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 1 and Dominican Republic in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Dominican Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8.9% | 7.6% | 1.3% | Denmark |
| 1970s | 2.2% | 13.5% | 11.3% | Dominican Republic |
| 1980s | 2.9% | 4.0% | 1.0% | Dominican Republic |
| 1990s | 3.4% | 10.9% | 7.5% | Dominican Republic |
| 2000s | 1.6% | 4.6% | 3.1% | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 2.5% | 6.5% | 4.0% | Dominican Republic |
| 2020s | 2.4% | 3.8% | 1.4% | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Denmark or Dominican Republic?
- Dominican Republic, at -3.0% against -3.5% in Denmark as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Denmark and Dominican Republic?
- 0.5%, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Dominican Republic?
- 59 years are reported by both, from 1967 to 2025.
- How do Denmark and Dominican Republic rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Denmark ranks 148th and Dominican Republic ranks 145th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Gross fixed capital formation (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.