Colombia vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Colombia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 1.3% against 1.2% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Colombia's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Colombia ranks 117th and Zimbabwe ranks 119th of 167 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.5% | 10.5% | 5.9% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | -1.5% | 6.4% | 7.9% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Colombia or Zimbabwe?
- Colombia, at 1.3% against 1.2% in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Colombia and Zimbabwe?
- 0.1%, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Zimbabwe?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Colombia and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Colombia ranks 117th and Zimbabwe ranks 119th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Gross fixed capital formation (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.