Central Europe and the Baltics vs Kyrgyzstan: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Central Europe and the Baltics
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 21.1% against 3.3% in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 17.8%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 6.5 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Central Europe and the Baltics ahead.
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 13th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th of 33 groups.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Europe and the Baltics | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.1% | 9.5% | 5.4% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 2.3% | 11.2% | 8.9% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Central Europe and the Baltics or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 21.1% against 3.3% in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Central Europe and the Baltics and Kyrgyzstan?
- 17.8%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Kyrgyzstan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
- How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 13th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th of 33 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Gross fixed capital formation (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.