Central Europe and the Baltics vs Chad: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Central Europe and the Baltics
- Chad
How they compare
Chad currently reports 18.8% against 3.3% in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 15.5%.
That makes Chad's figure about 5.8 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Central Europe and the Baltics ahead.
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 13th and Chad ranks 15th of 33 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, Central Europe and the Baltics averaged higher in 2 and Chad in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Europe and the Baltics | Chad | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.8% | 8.4% | 0.4% | Central Europe and the Baltics |
| 2000s | 3.9% | 26.5% | 22.6% | Chad |
| 2010s | 3.3% | 2.5% | 0.7% | Central Europe and the Baltics |
| 2020s | 2.3% | 3.9% | 1.6% | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Central Europe and the Baltics or Chad?
- Chad, at 18.8% against 3.3% in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Central Europe and the Baltics and Chad?
- 15.5%, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Chad?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Chad rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 13th and Chad ranks 15th of 33 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Gross fixed capital formation (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.