Mauritania vs Sudan: Gross domestic savings, private
Mauritania
13.75 billion current LCU
in 2003
Sudan
44.95 billion current LCU
in 2011
Mauritania rank
13th
Sudan rank
12th
Gross domestic savings, private over time
- Mauritania
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 44.95 billion current LCU against 13.75 billion current LCU in Mauritania, a difference of 31.21 billion current LCU.
That makes Sudan's figure about 3.3 times Mauritania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mauritania ahead.
Mauritania ranks 13th and Sudan ranks 12th of 26 countries.
Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 26.90 billion current LCU | 1.54 billion current LCU | 25.35 billion current LCU | Mauritania |
| 2000s | 30.98 billion current LCU | 4.34 billion current LCU | 26.64 billion current LCU | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross domestic savings, private, Mauritania or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 44.95 billion current LCU against 13.75 billion current LCU in Mauritania as of 2011.
- What is the difference in gross domestic savings, private between Mauritania and Sudan?
- 31.21 billion current LCU, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2003.
- How do Mauritania and Sudan rank globally for gross domestic savings, private?
- Mauritania ranks 13th and Sudan ranks 12th of 26 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as Gross domestic savings, private (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Private sector’s gross domestic saving is derived as value added in private sector at factor cost less private consumption, etc. Data are in current local currency.