Sierra Leone vs Zimbabwe: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre

Sierra Leone
5,640 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
3,678 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sierra Leone rank
142nd
Zimbabwe rank
145th

Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Sierra Leone
  • Zimbabwe
-5.0k05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196119922023

How they compare

Sierra Leone currently reports 5,640 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,678 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1,962 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.5 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Sierra Leone ahead.

Sierra Leone ranks 142nd and Zimbabwe ranks 145th of 184 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Sierra Leone averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sierra Leone Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 649.67 current US$ per square kilometre 580.05 current US$ per square kilometre 69.63 current US$ per square kilometre Sierra Leone
1970s 1,582 current US$ per square kilometre 1,738 current US$ per square kilometre 156.26 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 1,079 current US$ per square kilometre 2,870 current US$ per square kilometre 1,791 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 329.57 current US$ per square kilometre 3,301 current US$ per square kilometre 2,972 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 3,013 current US$ per square kilometre -243.96 current US$ per square kilometre 3,257 current US$ per square kilometre Sierra Leone
2010s 6,318 current US$ per square kilometre 959.12 current US$ per square kilometre 5,359 current US$ per square kilometre Sierra Leone
2020s 4,047 current US$ per square kilometre 4,159 current US$ per square kilometre 112.64 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre, Sierra Leone or Zimbabwe?
Sierra Leone, at 5,640 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,678 current US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre between Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe?
1,962 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sierra Leone ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe?
60 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2023.
How do Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre?
Sierra Leone ranks 142nd and Zimbabwe ranks 145th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sierra Leone vs Zimbabwe: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sierra-leone/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/sierra-leone/zimbabwe/">Sierra Leone vs Zimbabwe: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 10,452 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross domestic savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.