Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre

Papua New Guinea
2,883 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2004
Zimbabwe
3,678 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Papua New Guinea rank
148th
Zimbabwe rank
145th

Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Zimbabwe
-5.0k05.0k10.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 3,678 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,883 current US$ per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 795 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.3 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 148th and Zimbabwe ranks 145th of 184 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 8.82 current US$ per square kilometre 515.75 current US$ per square kilometre 506.93 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1970s 554.92 current US$ per square kilometre 1,738 current US$ per square kilometre 1,183 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 768.47 current US$ per square kilometre 2,870 current US$ per square kilometre 2,101 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 2,704 current US$ per square kilometre 3,301 current US$ per square kilometre 597.09 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 2,541 current US$ per square kilometre 1,031 current US$ per square kilometre 1,511 current US$ per square kilometre Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre, Papua New Guinea or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 3,678 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,883 current US$ per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre between Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
795 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
44 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2004.
How do Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre?
Papua New Guinea ranks 148th and Zimbabwe ranks 145th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/papua-new-guinea/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/papua-new-guinea/zimbabwe/">Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 10,452 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross domestic savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.