Mauritania vs Zimbabwe: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre

Mauritania
3,027 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
3,678 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania rank
147th
Zimbabwe rank
145th

Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritania
  • Zimbabwe
-5.0k05.0k10.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 3,678 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,027 current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritania, a difference of 651 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Mauritania's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Mauritania ranks 147th and Zimbabwe ranks 145th of 184 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 144.06 current US$ per square kilometre 515.75 current US$ per square kilometre 371.69 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1970s -15.24 current US$ per square kilometre 1,738 current US$ per square kilometre 1,753 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 34.19 current US$ per square kilometre 2,870 current US$ per square kilometre 2,836 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 242.69 current US$ per square kilometre 3,301 current US$ per square kilometre 3,058 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 480.88 current US$ per square kilometre -243.96 current US$ per square kilometre 724.84 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritania
2010s 2,015 current US$ per square kilometre 959.12 current US$ per square kilometre 1,056 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritania
2020s 2,783 current US$ per square kilometre 4,159 current US$ per square kilometre 1,376 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre, Mauritania or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 3,678 current US$ per square kilometre against 3,027 current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritania as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre between Mauritania and Zimbabwe?
651 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritania and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre?
Mauritania ranks 147th and Zimbabwe ranks 145th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Zimbabwe: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/zimbabwe/">Mauritania vs Zimbabwe: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 10,452 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross domestic savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.