Macau, China vs Singapore: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre

Macau, China
750.17 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
417.52 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Macau, China rank
1st
Singapore rank
2nd

Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Macau, China
  • Singapore
0500.0M1.0B1.5B196119922023

How they compare

Macau, China currently reports 750.17 million current US$ per square kilometre against 417.52 million current US$ per square kilometre in Singapore, a difference of 332.65 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Macau, China's figure about 1.8 times Singapore's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Macau, China ahead.

Macau, China ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 2nd of 184 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Macau, China averaged higher in 4 and Singapore in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macau, China Singapore Difference Ahead
1980s 33.12 million current US$ per square kilometre 13.62 million current US$ per square kilometre 19.49 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
1990s 130.98 million current US$ per square kilometre 53.52 million current US$ per square kilometre 77.46 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
2000s 261.70 million current US$ per square kilometre 94.80 million current US$ per square kilometre 166.90 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
2010s 1.03 billion current US$ per square kilometre 240.15 million current US$ per square kilometre 786.47 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
2020s 362.47 million current US$ per square kilometre 378.06 million current US$ per square kilometre 15.59 million current US$ per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre, Macau, China or Singapore?
Macau, China, at 750.17 million current US$ per square kilometre against 417.52 million current US$ per square kilometre in Singapore as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre between Macau, China and Singapore?
332.65 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Macau, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macau, China and Singapore?
42 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
How do Macau, China and Singapore rank globally for gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre?
Macau, China ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 2nd of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Macau, China vs Singapore: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/singapore/">Macau, China vs Singapore: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 10,452 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross domestic savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.