Faroe Islands vs Least developed countries: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre

Faroe Islands
933,467 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Least developed countries
12,949 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Faroe Islands rank
32nd
Least developed countries rank
33rd

Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Faroe Islands
  • Least developed countries
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k1.0M199020062023

How they compare

Faroe Islands currently reports 933,467 current US$ per square kilometre against 12,949 current US$ per square kilometre in Least developed countries, a difference of 920,518 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Faroe Islands's figure about 72.1 times Least developed countries's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Faroe Islands has been ahead every year.

Faroe Islands ranks 32nd and Least developed countries ranks 33rd of 184 countries.

Faroe Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Faroe Islands Least developed countries Difference Ahead
1990s 177,790 current US$ per square kilometre 903.43 current US$ per square kilometre 176,887 current US$ per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2000s 189,657 current US$ per square kilometre 4,166 current US$ per square kilometre 185,491 current US$ per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2010s 458,612 current US$ per square kilometre 10,074 current US$ per square kilometre 448,538 current US$ per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2020s 804,935 current US$ per square kilometre 12,792 current US$ per square kilometre 792,143 current US$ per square kilometre Faroe Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre, Faroe Islands or Least developed countries?
Faroe Islands, at 933,467 current US$ per square kilometre against 12,949 current US$ per square kilometre in Least developed countries as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre between Faroe Islands and Least developed countries?
920,518 current US$ per square kilometre, with Faroe Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Least developed countries?
26 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2023.
How do Faroe Islands and Least developed countries rank globally for gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre?
Faroe Islands ranks 32nd and Least developed countries ranks 33rd of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Faroe Islands vs Least developed countries: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/faroe-islands/least-developed-countries-un-classification/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/faroe-islands/least-developed-countries-un-classification/">Faroe Islands vs Least developed countries: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 10,452 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross domestic savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.