Egypt vs South Africa: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre

Egypt
56,683 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
52,278 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt rank
93rd
South Africa rank
95th

Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Egypt
  • South Africa
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119922023

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 56,683 current US$ per square kilometre against 52,278 current US$ per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 4,405 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Egypt's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was South Africa ahead.

Egypt ranks 93rd and South Africa ranks 95th of 184 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 584.47 current US$ per square kilometre 3,691 current US$ per square kilometre 3,107 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
1970s 1,336 current US$ per square kilometre 9,922 current US$ per square kilometre 8,586 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
1980s 6,095 current US$ per square kilometre 18,904 current US$ per square kilometre 12,809 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
1990s 8,463 current US$ per square kilometre 22,114 current US$ per square kilometre 13,650 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 16,679 current US$ per square kilometre 40,274 current US$ per square kilometre 23,595 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 24,526 current US$ per square kilometre 56,896 current US$ per square kilometre 32,370 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2020s 51,118 current US$ per square kilometre 56,175 current US$ per square kilometre 5,057 current US$ per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre, Egypt or South Africa?
Egypt, at 56,683 current US$ per square kilometre against 52,278 current US$ per square kilometre in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre between Egypt and South Africa?
4,405 current US$ per square kilometre, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and South Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Egypt and South Africa rank globally for gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre?
Egypt ranks 93rd and South Africa ranks 95th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs South Africa: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/south-africa/">Egypt vs South Africa: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 10,452 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross domestic savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.