East Asia & Pacific vs Malta: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre

East Asia & Pacific
486,865 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
27.03 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific rank
4th
Malta rank
5th

Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • East Asia & Pacific
  • Malta
010.0M20.0M30.0M196119922023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 27.03 million current US$ per square kilometre against 486,865 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 26.54 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 55.5 times East Asia & Pacific's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Malta ahead.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 4th and Malta ranks 5th of 41 groups.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific Malta Difference Ahead
1970s 14,058 current US$ per square kilometre 174,084 current US$ per square kilometre 160,026 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1980s 41,143 current US$ per square kilometre 764,667 current US$ per square kilometre 723,524 current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1990s 97,756 current US$ per square kilometre 2.06 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.96 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2000s 145,003 current US$ per square kilometre 3.68 million current US$ per square kilometre 3.53 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2010s 343,889 current US$ per square kilometre 11.89 million current US$ per square kilometre 11.55 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2020s 479,998 current US$ per square kilometre 23.51 million current US$ per square kilometre 23.03 million current US$ per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre, East Asia & Pacific or Malta?
Malta, at 27.03 million current US$ per square kilometre against 486,865 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre between East Asia & Pacific and Malta?
26.54 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Malta?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific and Malta rank globally for gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 4th and Malta ranks 5th of 41 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs Malta: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific/malta/">East Asia & Pacific vs Malta: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 10,452 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross domestic savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.