East Asia & Pacific vs Macau, China: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre

East Asia & Pacific
486,865 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Macau, China
750.17 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific rank
4th
Macau, China rank
1st

Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • East Asia & Pacific
  • Macau, China
0500.0M1.0B1.5B196119922023

How they compare

Macau, China currently reports 750.17 million current US$ per square kilometre against 486,865 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 749.68 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Macau, China's figure about 1,540.8 times East Asia & Pacific's.

Across all 42 years both countries report, Macau, China has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 4th and Macau, China ranks 1st of 41 groups.

Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific Macau, China Difference Ahead
1980s 44,622 current US$ per square kilometre 33.12 million current US$ per square kilometre 33.07 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
1990s 97,756 current US$ per square kilometre 130.98 million current US$ per square kilometre 130.89 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
2000s 145,003 current US$ per square kilometre 261.70 million current US$ per square kilometre 261.56 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
2010s 343,889 current US$ per square kilometre 1.03 billion current US$ per square kilometre 1.03 billion current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China
2020s 479,998 current US$ per square kilometre 362.47 million current US$ per square kilometre 361.99 million current US$ per square kilometre Macau, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre, East Asia & Pacific or Macau, China?
Macau, China, at 750.17 million current US$ per square kilometre against 486,865 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre between East Asia & Pacific and Macau, China?
749.68 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Macau, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Macau, China?
42 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific and Macau, China rank globally for gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 4th and Macau, China ranks 1st of 41 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs Macau, China: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific/macao-sar-china/">East Asia & Pacific vs Macau, China: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 10,452 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross domestic savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.