Cyprus vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre

Cyprus
892,514 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
9,132 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cyprus rank
33rd
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
36th

Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Cyprus
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196519942023

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 892,514 current US$ per square kilometre against 9,132 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 883,382 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cyprus's figure about 97.7 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 49 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.

Cyprus ranks 33rd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 36th of 184 countries.

Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1970s 10,690 current US$ per square kilometre 2,517 current US$ per square kilometre 8,173 current US$ per square kilometre Cyprus
1980s 69,313 current US$ per square kilometre 3,763 current US$ per square kilometre 65,550 current US$ per square kilometre Cyprus
1990s 199,151 current US$ per square kilometre 2,060 current US$ per square kilometre 197,091 current US$ per square kilometre Cyprus
2000s 386,450 current US$ per square kilometre 5,145 current US$ per square kilometre 381,305 current US$ per square kilometre Cyprus
2010s 440,814 current US$ per square kilometre 12,859 current US$ per square kilometre 427,955 current US$ per square kilometre Cyprus
2020s 760,518 current US$ per square kilometre 14,668 current US$ per square kilometre 745,849 current US$ per square kilometre Cyprus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre, Cyprus or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Cyprus, at 892,514 current US$ per square kilometre against 9,132 current US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre between Cyprus and Sub-Saharan Africa?
883,382 current US$ per square kilometre, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Sub-Saharan Africa?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Cyprus and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre?
Cyprus ranks 33rd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 36th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cyprus vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cyprus/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cyprus/sub-saharan-africa/">Cyprus vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 10,452 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross domestic savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.