Costa Rica vs Malaysia: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre

Costa Rica
353,069 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malaysia
335,568 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
52nd
Malaysia rank
55th

Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Malaysia
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 353,069 current US$ per square kilometre against 335,568 current US$ per square kilometre in Malaysia, a difference of 17,501 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Malaysia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 52nd and Malaysia ranks 55th of 184 countries.

Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Malaysia Difference Ahead
1960s 1,612 current US$ per square kilometre 1,809 current US$ per square kilometre 197.08 current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia
1970s 6,599 current US$ per square kilometre 9,424 current US$ per square kilometre 2,825 current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia
1980s 17,819 current US$ per square kilometre 31,264 current US$ per square kilometre 13,446 current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia
1990s 33,118 current US$ per square kilometre 92,616 current US$ per square kilometre 59,498 current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2000s 74,728 current US$ per square kilometre 189,724 current US$ per square kilometre 114,996 current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2010s 186,151 current US$ per square kilometre 326,588 current US$ per square kilometre 140,437 current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia
2020s 280,576 current US$ per square kilometre 329,724 current US$ per square kilometre 49,148 current US$ per square kilometre Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre, Costa Rica or Malaysia?
Costa Rica, at 353,069 current US$ per square kilometre against 335,568 current US$ per square kilometre in Malaysia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre between Costa Rica and Malaysia?
17,501 current US$ per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Malaysia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Malaysia rank globally for gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre?
Costa Rica ranks 52nd and Malaysia ranks 55th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Malaysia: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/malaysia/">Costa Rica vs Malaysia: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 10,452 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross domestic savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.