Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Libya: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre

Congo, Democratic Republic of the
9,688 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Libya
7,955 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank
135th
Libya rank
138th

Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Congo, Democratic Republic of the
  • Libya
010.0k20.0k30.0k199020062023

How they compare

Congo, Democratic Republic of the currently reports 9,688 current US$ per square kilometre against 7,955 current US$ per square kilometre in Libya, a difference of 1,733 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Congo, Democratic Republic of the's figure about 1.2 times Libya's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Libya ahead.

Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 135th and Libya ranks 138th of 184 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Congo, Democratic Republic of the averaged higher in 1 and Libya in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo, Democratic Republic of the Libya Difference Ahead
1990s 276.13 current US$ per square kilometre 3,269 current US$ per square kilometre 2,993 current US$ per square kilometre Libya
2000s 682.94 current US$ per square kilometre 15,041 current US$ per square kilometre 14,359 current US$ per square kilometre Libya
2010s 3,454 current US$ per square kilometre 10,563 current US$ per square kilometre 7,109 current US$ per square kilometre Libya
2020s 8,141 current US$ per square kilometre 5,943 current US$ per square kilometre 2,198 current US$ per square kilometre Congo, Democratic Republic of the

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre, Congo, Democratic Republic of the or Libya?
Congo, Democratic Republic of the, at 9,688 current US$ per square kilometre against 7,955 current US$ per square kilometre in Libya as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Libya?
1,733 current US$ per square kilometre, with Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Libya?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Libya rank globally for gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre?
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 135th and Libya ranks 138th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Libya: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/libya/">Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Libya: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 10,452 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross domestic savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.