Chad vs Sierra Leone: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre

Chad
4,464 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sierra Leone
5,640 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
144th
Sierra Leone rank
142nd

Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Chad
  • Sierra Leone
-5.0k05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k196119922023

How they compare

Sierra Leone currently reports 5,640 current US$ per square kilometre against 4,464 current US$ per square kilometre in Chad, a difference of 1,176 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.3 times Chad's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Sierra Leone ahead.

Chad ranks 144th and Sierra Leone ranks 142nd of 184 countries.

Sierra Leone has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
1960s 68.17 current US$ per square kilometre 649.67 current US$ per square kilometre 581.51 current US$ per square kilometre Sierra Leone
1970s 99.34 current US$ per square kilometre 1,470 current US$ per square kilometre 1,371 current US$ per square kilometre Sierra Leone
1980s -42.15 current US$ per square kilometre 1,286 current US$ per square kilometre 1,329 current US$ per square kilometre Sierra Leone
1990s 6.39 current US$ per square kilometre 329.57 current US$ per square kilometre 323.18 current US$ per square kilometre Sierra Leone
2000s 1,296 current US$ per square kilometre 3,013 current US$ per square kilometre 1,717 current US$ per square kilometre Sierra Leone
2010s 3,668 current US$ per square kilometre 6,318 current US$ per square kilometre 2,651 current US$ per square kilometre Sierra Leone
2020s 3,990 current US$ per square kilometre 4,047 current US$ per square kilometre 56.69 current US$ per square kilometre Sierra Leone

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre, Chad or Sierra Leone?
Sierra Leone, at 5,640 current US$ per square kilometre against 4,464 current US$ per square kilometre in Chad as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre between Chad and Sierra Leone?
1,176 current US$ per square kilometre, with Sierra Leone ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Sierra Leone?
57 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2023.
How do Chad and Sierra Leone rank globally for gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre?
Chad ranks 144th and Sierra Leone ranks 142nd of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Sierra Leone: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chad/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chad/sierra-leone/">Chad vs Sierra Leone: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 10,452 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross domestic savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.