Central Europe and the Baltics vs Hong Kong, China: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre

Central Europe and the Baltics
521,917 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China
60.43 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
3rd
Hong Kong, China rank
4th

Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Hong Kong, China
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M196119922023

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 60.43 million current US$ per square kilometre against 521,917 current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 59.91 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 115.8 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 3rd and Hong Kong, China ranks 4th of 41 groups.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
1990s 80,998 current US$ per square kilometre 46.88 million current US$ per square kilometre 46.80 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2000s 173,539 current US$ per square kilometre 55.87 million current US$ per square kilometre 55.69 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2010s 319,967 current US$ per square kilometre 68.99 million current US$ per square kilometre 68.67 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2020s 445,599 current US$ per square kilometre 68.41 million current US$ per square kilometre 67.97 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre, Central Europe and the Baltics or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 60.43 million current US$ per square kilometre against 521,917 current US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre between Central Europe and the Baltics and Hong Kong, China?
59.91 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Hong Kong, China?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Hong Kong, China rank globally for gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 3rd and Hong Kong, China ranks 4th of 41 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Hong Kong, China: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/hong-kong-sar-china/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Hong Kong, China: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 10,452 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross domestic savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.