Bermuda vs Hong Kong, China: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre

Bermuda
69.30 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China
60.43 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bermuda rank
3rd
Hong Kong, China rank
4th

Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bermuda
  • Hong Kong, China
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M196119922023

How they compare

Bermuda currently reports 69.30 million current US$ per square kilometre against 60.43 million current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 8.86 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bermuda's figure about 1.1 times Hong Kong, China's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Bermuda ranks 3rd and Hong Kong, China ranks 4th of 184 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bermuda Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
2010s 48.11 million current US$ per square kilometre 68.99 million current US$ per square kilometre 20.88 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2020s 57.14 million current US$ per square kilometre 68.41 million current US$ per square kilometre 11.27 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre, Bermuda or Hong Kong, China?
Bermuda, at 69.30 million current US$ per square kilometre against 60.43 million current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre between Bermuda and Hong Kong, China?
8.86 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Bermuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bermuda and Hong Kong, China?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Bermuda and Hong Kong, China rank globally for gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre?
Bermuda ranks 3rd and Hong Kong, China ranks 4th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bermuda vs Hong Kong, China: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bermuda/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bermuda/hong-kong-sar-china/">Bermuda vs Hong Kong, China: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 10,452 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross domestic savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.