Belarus vs Equatorial Guinea: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre

Belarus
100,748 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
90,384 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
81st
Equatorial Guinea rank
83rd

Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Belarus
  • Equatorial Guinea
0200.0k400.0k600.0k199220072023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 100,748 current US$ per square kilometre against 90,384 current US$ per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 10,364 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Belarus ranks 81st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 83rd of 184 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Equatorial Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 64,790 current US$ per square kilometre 348,257 current US$ per square kilometre 283,467 current US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 100,434 current US$ per square kilometre 295,985 current US$ per square kilometre 195,552 current US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 102,859 current US$ per square kilometre 93,902 current US$ per square kilometre 8,958 current US$ per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre, Belarus or Equatorial Guinea?
Belarus, at 100,748 current US$ per square kilometre against 90,384 current US$ per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre between Belarus and Equatorial Guinea?
10,364 current US$ per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Equatorial Guinea?
19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 81st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 83rd of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Equatorial Guinea: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/equatorial-guinea/">Belarus vs Equatorial Guinea: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 10,452 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross domestic savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.