Arab World vs Denmark: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre

Arab World
93,080 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Denmark
3.30 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Arab World rank
23rd
Denmark rank
20th

Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Arab World
  • Denmark
01.0M2.0M3.0M196619942023

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 3.30 million current US$ per square kilometre against 93,080 current US$ per square kilometre in Arab World, a difference of 3.21 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Denmark's figure about 35.5 times Arab World's.

Across all 56 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.

Arab World ranks 23rd and Denmark ranks 20th of 41 groups.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Arab World Denmark Difference Ahead
1960s 654.24 current US$ per square kilometre 88,043 current US$ per square kilometre 87,388 current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
1970s 5,729 current US$ per square kilometre 215,642 current US$ per square kilometre 209,913 current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
1980s 9,174 current US$ per square kilometre 451,139 current US$ per square kilometre 441,965 current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
1990s 10,809 current US$ per square kilometre 1.05 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.04 million current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2000s 43,378 current US$ per square kilometre 1.73 million current US$ per square kilometre 1.68 million current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2010s 77,710 current US$ per square kilometre 2.22 million current US$ per square kilometre 2.14 million current US$ per square kilometre Denmark
2020s 81,876 current US$ per square kilometre 3.08 million current US$ per square kilometre 3.00 million current US$ per square kilometre Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre, Arab World or Denmark?
Denmark, at 3.30 million current US$ per square kilometre against 93,080 current US$ per square kilometre in Arab World as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre between Arab World and Denmark?
3.21 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Arab World and Denmark?
56 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2023.
How do Arab World and Denmark rank globally for gross domestic savings (current us$), per square kilometre?
Arab World ranks 23rd and Denmark ranks 20th of 41 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Arab World vs Denmark: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/arab-world/denmark/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/arab-world/denmark/">Arab World vs Denmark: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 10,452 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross domestic savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.