Malawi vs Namibia: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per capita
Malawi
-15.9 current US$ per person
in 2025
Namibia
-26.89 current US$ per person
in 2025
Malawi rank
161st
Namibia rank
163rd
Gross domestic savings (current US$), per capita over time
- Malawi
- Namibia
How they compare
Malawi currently reports -15.9 current US$ per person against -26.89 current US$ per person in Namibia, a difference of 10.99 current US$ per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Namibia ahead.
Malawi ranks 161st and Namibia ranks 163rd of 187 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 17.87 current US$ per person | 235.37 current US$ per person | 217.5 current US$ per person | Namibia |
| 2020s | -16.27 current US$ per person | 55.2 current US$ per person | 71.47 current US$ per person | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross domestic savings (current us$), per capita, Malawi or Namibia?
- Malawi, at -15.9 current US$ per person against -26.89 current US$ per person in Namibia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current us$), per capita between Malawi and Namibia?
- 10.99 current US$ per person, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Namibia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2025.
- How do Malawi and Namibia rank globally for gross domestic savings (current us$), per capita?
- Malawi ranks 161st and Namibia ranks 163rd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic savings (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.