Jordan vs Yemen: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per capita
Jordan
-181.88 current US$ per person
in 2007
Yemen
-205.31 current US$ per person
in 2018
Jordan rank
171st
Yemen rank
172nd
Gross domestic savings (current US$), per capita over time
- Jordan
- Yemen
How they compare
Jordan currently reports -181.88 current US$ per person against -205.31 current US$ per person in Yemen, a difference of 23.43 current US$ per person.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Yemen ahead.
Jordan ranks 171st and Yemen ranks 172nd of 187 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 1 and Yemen in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 65.68 current US$ per person | 16.74 current US$ per person | 48.94 current US$ per person | Jordan |
| 2000s | -80.32 current US$ per person | 119.42 current US$ per person | 199.73 current US$ per person | Yemen |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross domestic savings (current us$), per capita, Jordan or Yemen?
- Jordan, at -181.88 current US$ per person against -205.31 current US$ per person in Yemen as of 2007.
- What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current us$), per capita between Jordan and Yemen?
- 23.43 current US$ per person, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Yemen?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2007.
- How do Jordan and Yemen rank globally for gross domestic savings (current us$), per capita?
- Jordan ranks 171st and Yemen ranks 172nd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic savings (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.