Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Hong Kong, China: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per capita

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
286.45 current US$ per person
in 2025
Hong Kong, China
12,091 current US$ per person
in 2025
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
33rd
Hong Kong, China rank
30th

Gross domestic savings (current US$), per capita over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Hong Kong, China
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k196019922025

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 12,091 current US$ per person against 286.45 current US$ per person in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 11,805 current US$ per person.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 42.2 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

Across all 40 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 33rd and Hong Kong, China ranks 30th of 41 groups.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
1980s 63.3 current US$ per person 3,570 current US$ per person 3,506 current US$ per person Hong Kong, China
1990s 46.83 current US$ per person 6,843 current US$ per person 6,796 current US$ per person Hong Kong, China
2000s 83.05 current US$ per person 8,596 current US$ per person 8,513 current US$ per person Hong Kong, China
2010s 170.45 current US$ per person 9,968 current US$ per person 9,798 current US$ per person Hong Kong, China
2020s 219.46 current US$ per person 10,254 current US$ per person 10,034 current US$ per person Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic savings (current us$), per capita, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 12,091 current US$ per person against 286.45 current US$ per person in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current us$), per capita between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Hong Kong, China?
11,805 current US$ per person, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Hong Kong, China?
40 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2025.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Hong Kong, China rank globally for gross domestic savings (current us$), per capita?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 33rd and Hong Kong, China ranks 30th of 41 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Hong Kong, China: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-us-per-capita/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-us-per-capita/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/hong-kong-sar-china/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Hong Kong, China: Gross domestic savings (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic savings (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
230 places, 11,097 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross domestic savings (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.