Cape Verde vs Lithuania: Gross domestic savings
Gross domestic savings over time
- Cape Verde
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 21.99 billion current LCU against 18.04 billion current LCU in Cape Verde, a difference of 3.95 billion current LCU.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.2 times Cape Verde's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 125th and Lithuania ranks 122nd of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 2 and Lithuania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.13 billion current LCU | 4.70 billion current LCU | 25.43 billion current LCU | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 30.07 billion current LCU | 8.24 billion current LCU | 21.83 billion current LCU | Cape Verde |
| 2020s | 8.02 billion current LCU | 17.89 billion current LCU | 9.86 billion current LCU | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross domestic savings, Cape Verde or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 21.99 billion current LCU against 18.04 billion current LCU in Cape Verde as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross domestic savings between Cape Verde and Lithuania?
- 3.95 billion current LCU, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Lithuania?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2025.
- How do Cape Verde and Lithuania rank globally for gross domestic savings?
- Cape Verde ranks 125th and Lithuania ranks 122nd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross domestic savings (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic savings are calculated as GDP less final consumption expenditure (total consumption). This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.