Hong Kong, China vs Saudi Arabia: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per unit of GDP

Hong Kong, China
1.65 current LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Saudi Arabia
1.24 current LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Hong Kong, China rank
90th
Saudi Arabia rank
93rd

Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per unit of GDP over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Saudi Arabia
0123196019922025

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 1.65 current LCU per US$ of GDP against 1.24 current LCU per US$ of GDP in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.41 current LCU per US$ of GDP.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.3 times Saudi Arabia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 90th and Saudi Arabia ranks 93rd of 187 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 5 and Saudi Arabia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1960s 1.44 current LCU per US$ of GDP 2.21 current LCU per US$ of GDP 0.7764 current LCU per US$ of GDP Saudi Arabia
1970s 1.59 current LCU per US$ of GDP 2.27 current LCU per US$ of GDP 0.6778 current LCU per US$ of GDP Saudi Arabia
1980s 2.38 current LCU per US$ of GDP 0.923 current LCU per US$ of GDP 1.46 current LCU per US$ of GDP Hong Kong, China
1990s 2.48 current LCU per US$ of GDP 1.05 current LCU per US$ of GDP 1.43 current LCU per US$ of GDP Hong Kong, China
2000s 2.46 current LCU per US$ of GDP 1.69 current LCU per US$ of GDP 0.7691 current LCU per US$ of GDP Hong Kong, China
2010s 1.91 current LCU per US$ of GDP 1.48 current LCU per US$ of GDP 0.4301 current LCU per US$ of GDP Hong Kong, China
2020s 1.56 current LCU per US$ of GDP 1.26 current LCU per US$ of GDP 0.3047 current LCU per US$ of GDP Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic savings (current lcu), per unit of gdp, Hong Kong, China or Saudi Arabia?
Hong Kong, China, at 1.65 current LCU per US$ of GDP against 1.24 current LCU per US$ of GDP in Saudi Arabia as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current lcu), per unit of gdp between Hong Kong, China and Saudi Arabia?
0.41 current LCU per US$ of GDP, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Saudi Arabia?
58 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2025.
How do Hong Kong, China and Saudi Arabia rank globally for gross domestic savings (current lcu), per unit of gdp?
Hong Kong, China ranks 90th and Saudi Arabia ranks 93rd of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Saudi Arabia: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/hong-kong-sar-china/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/hong-kong-sar-china/saudi-arabia/">Hong Kong, China vs Saudi Arabia: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per unit of GDP
Unit
current LCU per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 8,715 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross domestic savings (current LCU) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.