Morocco vs Saudi Arabia: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre

Morocco
686,854 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Saudi Arabia
754,155 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Morocco rank
107th
Saudi Arabia rank
105th

Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Morocco
  • Saudi Arabia
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k1.0M196119922023

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 754,155 current LCU per square kilometre against 686,854 current LCU per square kilometre in Morocco, a difference of 67,301 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.1 times Morocco's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.

Morocco ranks 107th and Saudi Arabia ranks 105th of 184 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Morocco averaged higher in 5 and Saudi Arabia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Morocco Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1960s 4,888 current LCU per square kilometre 4,460 current LCU per square kilometre 427.97 current LCU per square kilometre Morocco
1970s 11,136 current LCU per square kilometre 43,176 current LCU per square kilometre 32,040 current LCU per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
1980s 72,947 current LCU per square kilometre 60,190 current LCU per square kilometre 12,757 current LCU per square kilometre Morocco
1990s 182,904 current LCU per square kilometre 70,530 current LCU per square kilometre 112,375 current LCU per square kilometre Morocco
2000s 437,891 current LCU per square kilometre 255,166 current LCU per square kilometre 182,724 current LCU per square kilometre Morocco
2010s 557,881 current LCU per square kilometre 504,624 current LCU per square kilometre 53,256 current LCU per square kilometre Morocco
2020s 605,616 current LCU per square kilometre 636,766 current LCU per square kilometre 31,149 current LCU per square kilometre Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre, Morocco or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 754,155 current LCU per square kilometre against 686,854 current LCU per square kilometre in Morocco as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre between Morocco and Saudi Arabia?
67,301 current LCU per square kilometre, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Saudi Arabia?
56 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2023.
How do Morocco and Saudi Arabia rank globally for gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Morocco ranks 107th and Saudi Arabia ranks 105th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Morocco vs Saudi Arabia: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/morocco/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/morocco/saudi-arabia/">Morocco vs Saudi Arabia: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 8,168 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross domestic savings (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.