Indonesia vs Macau, China: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre

Indonesia
4.21 billion current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Macau, China
6.05 billion current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Indonesia rank
5th
Macau, China rank
4th

Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Indonesia
  • Macau, China
02.5B5.0B7.5B10.0B196119922023

How they compare

Macau, China currently reports 6.05 billion current LCU per square kilometre against 4.21 billion current LCU per square kilometre in Indonesia, a difference of 1.84 billion current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Macau, China's figure about 1.4 times Indonesia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Macau, China ahead.

Indonesia ranks 5th and Macau, China ranks 4th of 184 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 1 and Macau, China in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Macau, China Difference Ahead
1980s 16.16 million current LCU per square kilometre 260.12 million current LCU per square kilometre 243.96 million current LCU per square kilometre Macau, China
1990s 76.15 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.04 billion current LCU per square kilometre 968.64 million current LCU per square kilometre Macau, China
2000s 457.26 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.10 billion current LCU per square kilometre 1.64 billion current LCU per square kilometre Macau, China
2010s 2.00 billion current LCU per square kilometre 8.23 billion current LCU per square kilometre 6.23 billion current LCU per square kilometre Macau, China
2020s 3.50 billion current LCU per square kilometre 2.91 billion current LCU per square kilometre 587.15 million current LCU per square kilometre Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre, Indonesia or Macau, China?
Macau, China, at 6.05 billion current LCU per square kilometre against 4.21 billion current LCU per square kilometre in Indonesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre between Indonesia and Macau, China?
1.84 billion current LCU per square kilometre, with Macau, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Macau, China?
42 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
How do Indonesia and Macau, China rank globally for gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Indonesia ranks 5th and Macau, China ranks 4th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Indonesia vs Macau, China: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/indonesia/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/indonesia/macao-sar-china/">Indonesia vs Macau, China: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 8,168 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross domestic savings (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.