Guinea-Bissau vs Sweden: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre

Guinea-Bissau
5.03 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
4.23 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
72nd
Sweden rank
75th

Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Sweden
-2.0M02.0M4.0M6.0M196119922023

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 5.03 million current LCU per square kilometre against 4.23 million current LCU per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 804,630 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.2 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sweden ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 72nd and Sweden ranks 75th of 184 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Sweden Difference Ahead
1970s -432.82 current LCU per square kilometre 214,085 current LCU per square kilometre 214,518 current LCU per square kilometre Sweden
1980s 2,774 current LCU per square kilometre 630,162 current LCU per square kilometre 627,389 current LCU per square kilometre Sweden
1990s -211,022 current LCU per square kilometre 1.16 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.37 million current LCU per square kilometre Sweden
2000s -87,380 current LCU per square kilometre 1.99 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.08 million current LCU per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 2.18 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.76 million current LCU per square kilometre 580,896 current LCU per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 4.13 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.92 million current LCU per square kilometre 209,540 current LCU per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre, Guinea-Bissau or Sweden?
Guinea-Bissau, at 5.03 million current LCU per square kilometre against 4.23 million current LCU per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre between Guinea-Bissau and Sweden?
804,630 current LCU per square kilometre, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Sweden?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Sweden rank globally for gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 72nd and Sweden ranks 75th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Sweden: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/sweden/">Guinea-Bissau vs Sweden: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 8,168 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross domestic savings (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.