Guatemala vs Mauritania: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre

Guatemala
108,567 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania
110,861 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
137th
Mauritania rank
134th

Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • Mauritania
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 110,861 current LCU per square kilometre against 108,567 current LCU per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 2,294 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritania ahead.

Guatemala ranks 137th and Mauritania ranks 134th of 184 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 1,297 current LCU per square kilometre 713.69 current LCU per square kilometre 582.91 current LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
1970s 5,384 current LCU per square kilometre -47.94 current LCU per square kilometre 5,432 current LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 11,702 current LCU per square kilometre 338.74 current LCU per square kilometre 11,363 current LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 67,926 current LCU per square kilometre 3,007 current LCU per square kilometre 64,919 current LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 64,176 current LCU per square kilometre 12,381 current LCU per square kilometre 51,795 current LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 154,651 current LCU per square kilometre 64,601 current LCU per square kilometre 90,050 current LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 142,403 current LCU per square kilometre 102,107 current LCU per square kilometre 40,295 current LCU per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre, Guatemala or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at 110,861 current LCU per square kilometre against 108,567 current LCU per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre between Guatemala and Mauritania?
2,294 current LCU per square kilometre, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Mauritania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Mauritania rank globally for gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 137th and Mauritania ranks 134th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Mauritania: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/mauritania/">Guatemala vs Mauritania: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 8,168 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross domestic savings (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.