Ecuador vs Guatemala: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre

Ecuador
101,478 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala
108,567 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
138th
Guatemala rank
137th

Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Guatemala
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 108,567 current LCU per square kilometre against 101,478 current LCU per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 7,089 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 17 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 138th and Guatemala ranks 137th of 184 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Guatemala in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 1,736 current LCU per square kilometre 1,297 current LCU per square kilometre 439.64 current LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 5,690 current LCU per square kilometre 5,384 current LCU per square kilometre 305.15 current LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 13,128 current LCU per square kilometre 11,702 current LCU per square kilometre 1,426 current LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 15,995 current LCU per square kilometre 67,926 current LCU per square kilometre 51,930 current LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 34,878 current LCU per square kilometre 64,176 current LCU per square kilometre 29,298 current LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 88,224 current LCU per square kilometre 154,651 current LCU per square kilometre 66,427 current LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 94,307 current LCU per square kilometre 142,403 current LCU per square kilometre 48,096 current LCU per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 108,567 current LCU per square kilometre against 101,478 current LCU per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Guatemala?
7,089 current LCU per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Guatemala?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Guatemala rank globally for gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 138th and Guatemala ranks 137th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Guatemala: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/guatemala/">Ecuador vs Guatemala: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 8,168 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross domestic savings (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.