Côte d'Ivoire vs Israel: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre

Côte d'Ivoire
31.74 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Israel
25.30 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Côte d'Ivoire rank
33rd
Israel rank
36th

Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Côte d'Ivoire
  • Israel
010.0M20.0M30.0M196119922023

How they compare

Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 31.74 million current LCU per square kilometre against 25.30 million current LCU per square kilometre in Israel, a difference of 6.44 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Côte d'Ivoire's figure about 1.3 times Israel's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Côte d'Ivoire ahead.

Côte d'Ivoire ranks 33rd and Israel ranks 36th of 184 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Côte d'Ivoire averaged higher in 5 and Israel in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Côte d'Ivoire Israel Difference Ahead
1970s 858,428 current LCU per square kilometre 109.02 current LCU per square kilometre 858,319 current LCU per square kilometre Côte d'Ivoire
1980s 1.73 million current LCU per square kilometre 286,424 current LCU per square kilometre 1.44 million current LCU per square kilometre Côte d'Ivoire
1990s 3.63 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.13 million current LCU per square kilometre 500,718 current LCU per square kilometre Côte d'Ivoire
2000s 6.99 million current LCU per square kilometre 7.01 million current LCU per square kilometre 11,854 current LCU per square kilometre Israel
2010s 18.39 million current LCU per square kilometre 12.98 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.41 million current LCU per square kilometre Côte d'Ivoire
2020s 29.52 million current LCU per square kilometre 22.28 million current LCU per square kilometre 7.24 million current LCU per square kilometre Côte d'Ivoire

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre, Côte d'Ivoire or Israel?
Côte d'Ivoire, at 31.74 million current LCU per square kilometre against 25.30 million current LCU per square kilometre in Israel as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre between Côte d'Ivoire and Israel?
6.44 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Israel?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Côte d'Ivoire and Israel rank globally for gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 33rd and Israel ranks 36th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Côte d'Ivoire vs Israel: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/israel/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/israel/">Côte d'Ivoire vs Israel: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 8,168 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross domestic savings (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.