Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Serbia: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre

Congo, Democratic Republic of the
23.68 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Serbia
21.26 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank
39th
Serbia rank
41st

Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Congo, Democratic Republic of the
  • Serbia
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M25.0M199420082023

How they compare

Congo, Democratic Republic of the currently reports 23.68 million current LCU per square kilometre against 21.26 million current LCU per square kilometre in Serbia, a difference of 2.42 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Congo, Democratic Republic of the's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.

Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 39th and Serbia ranks 41st of 184 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Congo, Democratic Republic of the averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo, Democratic Republic of the Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 601,257 current LCU per square kilometre 1.56 million current LCU per square kilometre 961,380 current LCU per square kilometre Serbia
2010s 4.06 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.54 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.47 million current LCU per square kilometre Serbia
2020s 17.20 million current LCU per square kilometre 14.97 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.23 million current LCU per square kilometre Congo, Democratic Republic of the

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre, Congo, Democratic Republic of the or Serbia?
Congo, Democratic Republic of the, at 23.68 million current LCU per square kilometre against 21.26 million current LCU per square kilometre in Serbia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Serbia?
2.42 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Serbia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Serbia rank globally for gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 39th and Serbia ranks 41st of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Serbia: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/serbia/">Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Serbia: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 8,168 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross domestic savings (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.