Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Malta: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre

Congo, Democratic Republic of the
23.68 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
25.00 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank
39th
Malta rank
37th

Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Congo, Democratic Republic of the
  • Malta
010.0M20.0M197019962023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 25.00 million current LCU per square kilometre against 23.68 million current LCU per square kilometre in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, a difference of 1.32 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Congo, Democratic Republic of the's.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 39th and Malta ranks 37th of 184 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo, Democratic Republic of the Malta Difference Ahead
1990s 441.81 current LCU per square kilometre 1.99 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.99 million current LCU per square kilometre Malta
2000s 318,226 current LCU per square kilometre 2.98 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.67 million current LCU per square kilometre Malta
2010s 4.06 million current LCU per square kilometre 10.00 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.94 million current LCU per square kilometre Malta
2020s 17.20 million current LCU per square kilometre 21.15 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.95 million current LCU per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre, Congo, Democratic Republic of the or Malta?
Malta, at 25.00 million current LCU per square kilometre against 23.68 million current LCU per square kilometre in Congo, Democratic Republic of the as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Malta?
1.32 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Malta?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Malta rank globally for gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 39th and Malta ranks 37th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Malta: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/malta/">Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Malta: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 8,168 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross domestic savings (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.