Burundi vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre

Burundi
84.29 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
78.92 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Burundi rank
24th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
25th

Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Burundi
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
-25.0M025.0M50.0M75.0M196119922023

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 84.29 million current LCU per square kilometre against 78.92 million current LCU per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 5.36 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Burundi's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Burundi ranks 24th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 25th of 184 countries.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s -513,861 current LCU per square kilometre 1.30 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.81 million current LCU per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s -3.66 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.73 million current LCU per square kilometre 9.38 million current LCU per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s -4.92 million current LCU per square kilometre 29.01 million current LCU per square kilometre 33.92 million current LCU per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 52.55 million current LCU per square kilometre 71.40 million current LCU per square kilometre 18.85 million current LCU per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre, Burundi or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Burundi, at 84.29 million current LCU per square kilometre against 78.92 million current LCU per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre between Burundi and Tanzania, United Republic of?
5.36 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Tanzania, United Republic of?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Burundi and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Burundi ranks 24th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 25th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/burundi/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/burundi/tanzania/">Burundi vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 8,168 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross domestic savings (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.