Burundi vs Chile: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre

Burundi
84.29 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile
91.93 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Burundi rank
24th
Chile rank
22nd

Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Burundi
  • Chile
-25.0M025.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 91.93 million current LCU per square kilometre against 84.29 million current LCU per square kilometre in Burundi, a difference of 7.64 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Burundi's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Burundi ahead.

Burundi ranks 24th and Chile ranks 22nd of 184 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 2 and Chile in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Chile Difference Ahead
1960s 24,537 current LCU per square kilometre 6.36 current LCU per square kilometre 24,530 current LCU per square kilometre Burundi
1970s 61,988 current LCU per square kilometre 40,481 current LCU per square kilometre 21,507 current LCU per square kilometre Burundi
1980s 157,299 current LCU per square kilometre 1.11 million current LCU per square kilometre 951,800 current LCU per square kilometre Chile
1990s -513,861 current LCU per square kilometre 9.20 million current LCU per square kilometre 9.71 million current LCU per square kilometre Chile
2000s -3.66 million current LCU per square kilometre 28.17 million current LCU per square kilometre 31.83 million current LCU per square kilometre Chile
2010s -4.92 million current LCU per square kilometre 52.57 million current LCU per square kilometre 57.49 million current LCU per square kilometre Chile
2020s 52.55 million current LCU per square kilometre 78.32 million current LCU per square kilometre 25.77 million current LCU per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre, Burundi or Chile?
Chile, at 91.93 million current LCU per square kilometre against 84.29 million current LCU per square kilometre in Burundi as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre between Burundi and Chile?
7.64 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Chile?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Burundi and Chile rank globally for gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Burundi ranks 24th and Chile ranks 22nd of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Chile: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/burundi/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/burundi/chile/">Burundi vs Chile: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 8,168 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross domestic savings (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.