Botswana vs Sierra Leone: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre

Botswana
131,007 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Sierra Leone
120,168 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
132nd
Sierra Leone rank
133rd

Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Sierra Leone
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 131,007 current LCU per square kilometre against 120,168 current LCU per square kilometre in Sierra Leone, a difference of 10,839 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Sierra Leone's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Sierra Leone ahead.

Botswana ranks 132nd and Sierra Leone ranks 133rd of 184 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 6 and Sierra Leone in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
1960s -1.17 current LCU per square kilometre 0.4852 current LCU per square kilometre 1.66 current LCU per square kilometre Sierra Leone
1970s 106.25 current LCU per square kilometre 1.5 current LCU per square kilometre 104.75 current LCU per square kilometre Botswana
1980s 1,816 current LCU per square kilometre 29.03 current LCU per square kilometre 1,787 current LCU per square kilometre Botswana
1990s 8,921 current LCU per square kilometre -30.92 current LCU per square kilometre 8,952 current LCU per square kilometre Botswana
2000s 31,142 current LCU per square kilometre 10,029 current LCU per square kilometre 21,113 current LCU per square kilometre Botswana
2010s 64,502 current LCU per square kilometre 30,777 current LCU per square kilometre 33,726 current LCU per square kilometre Botswana
2020s 102,212 current LCU per square kilometre 59,940 current LCU per square kilometre 42,271 current LCU per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre, Botswana or Sierra Leone?
Botswana, at 131,007 current LCU per square kilometre against 120,168 current LCU per square kilometre in Sierra Leone as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre between Botswana and Sierra Leone?
10,839 current LCU per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Sierra Leone?
60 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Sierra Leone rank globally for gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 132nd and Sierra Leone ranks 133rd of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Sierra Leone: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/botswana/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/botswana/sierra-leone/">Botswana vs Sierra Leone: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 8,168 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross domestic savings (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.