Botswana vs Mauritania: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre

Botswana
131,007 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania
110,861 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
132nd
Mauritania rank
134th

Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Mauritania
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 131,007 current LCU per square kilometre against 110,861 current LCU per square kilometre in Mauritania, a difference of 20,146 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.2 times Mauritania's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritania ahead.

Botswana ranks 132nd and Mauritania ranks 134th of 184 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 5 and Mauritania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s -2.24 current LCU per square kilometre 713.69 current LCU per square kilometre 715.93 current LCU per square kilometre Mauritania
1970s 106.25 current LCU per square kilometre -47.94 current LCU per square kilometre 154.19 current LCU per square kilometre Botswana
1980s 1,816 current LCU per square kilometre 338.74 current LCU per square kilometre 1,477 current LCU per square kilometre Botswana
1990s 8,921 current LCU per square kilometre 3,007 current LCU per square kilometre 5,914 current LCU per square kilometre Botswana
2000s 31,142 current LCU per square kilometre 12,381 current LCU per square kilometre 18,761 current LCU per square kilometre Botswana
2010s 64,502 current LCU per square kilometre 64,601 current LCU per square kilometre 98.24 current LCU per square kilometre Mauritania
2020s 102,212 current LCU per square kilometre 102,107 current LCU per square kilometre 104.38 current LCU per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre, Botswana or Mauritania?
Botswana, at 131,007 current LCU per square kilometre against 110,861 current LCU per square kilometre in Mauritania as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre between Botswana and Mauritania?
20,146 current LCU per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Mauritania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Mauritania rank globally for gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 132nd and Mauritania ranks 134th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Mauritania: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/botswana/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/botswana/mauritania/">Botswana vs Mauritania: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 8,168 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross domestic savings (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.