Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Libya: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre

Bolivia, Plurinational State of
47,344 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Libya
38,288 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank
145th
Libya rank
146th

Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Bolivia, Plurinational State of
  • Libya
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119922023

How they compare

Bolivia, Plurinational State of currently reports 47,344 current LCU per square kilometre against 38,288 current LCU per square kilometre in Libya, a difference of 9,056 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Bolivia, Plurinational State of's figure about 1.2 times Libya's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Bolivia, Plurinational State of ahead.

Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 145th and Libya ranks 146th of 184 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bolivia, Plurinational State of averaged higher in 3 and Libya in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia, Plurinational State of Libya Difference Ahead
1990s 2,875 current LCU per square kilometre 1,227 current LCU per square kilometre 1,647 current LCU per square kilometre Bolivia, Plurinational State of
2000s 13,456 current LCU per square kilometre 17,953 current LCU per square kilometre 4,497 current LCU per square kilometre Libya
2010s 43,380 current LCU per square kilometre 13,697 current LCU per square kilometre 29,683 current LCU per square kilometre Bolivia, Plurinational State of
2020s 47,179 current LCU per square kilometre 28,196 current LCU per square kilometre 18,983 current LCU per square kilometre Bolivia, Plurinational State of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre, Bolivia, Plurinational State of or Libya?
Bolivia, Plurinational State of, at 47,344 current LCU per square kilometre against 38,288 current LCU per square kilometre in Libya as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre between Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Libya?
9,056 current LCU per square kilometre, with Bolivia, Plurinational State of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Libya?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Libya rank globally for gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 145th and Libya ranks 146th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Libya: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/libya/">Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Libya: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 8,168 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross domestic savings (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.