Bangladesh vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre

Bangladesh
89.00 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
78.92 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
23rd
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
25th

Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M196119922023

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 89.00 million current LCU per square kilometre against 78.92 million current LCU per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 10.08 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 23rd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 25th of 184 countries.

Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 1.98 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.30 million current LCU per square kilometre 678,893 current LCU per square kilometre Bangladesh
2000s 6.93 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.73 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.21 million current LCU per square kilometre Bangladesh
2010s 31.98 million current LCU per square kilometre 29.01 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.97 million current LCU per square kilometre Bangladesh
2020s 75.15 million current LCU per square kilometre 71.40 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.74 million current LCU per square kilometre Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre, Bangladesh or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Bangladesh, at 89.00 million current LCU per square kilometre against 78.92 million current LCU per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre between Bangladesh and Tanzania, United Republic of?
10.08 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Tanzania, United Republic of?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Bangladesh ranks 23rd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 25th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/tanzania/">Bangladesh vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 8,168 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross domestic savings (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.