Austria vs Puerto Rico: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre

Austria
1.61 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Puerto Rico
1.86 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Austria rank
91st
Puerto Rico rank
88th

Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Austria
  • Puerto Rico
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M196319932023

How they compare

Puerto Rico currently reports 1.86 million current LCU per square kilometre against 1.61 million current LCU per square kilometre in Austria, a difference of 255,530 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Puerto Rico's figure about 1.2 times Austria's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Austria ahead.

Austria ranks 91st and Puerto Rico ranks 88th of 184 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 2 and Puerto Rico in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1970s 167,823 current LCU per square kilometre 47,005 current LCU per square kilometre 120,819 current LCU per square kilometre Austria
1980s 303,728 current LCU per square kilometre 300,498 current LCU per square kilometre 3,229 current LCU per square kilometre Austria
1990s 536,314 current LCU per square kilometre 1.19 million current LCU per square kilometre 649,130 current LCU per square kilometre Puerto Rico
2000s 837,781 current LCU per square kilometre 2.91 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.07 million current LCU per square kilometre Puerto Rico
2010s 1.14 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.45 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.31 million current LCU per square kilometre Puerto Rico
2020s 1.48 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.33 million current LCU per square kilometre 849,205 current LCU per square kilometre Puerto Rico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre, Austria or Puerto Rico?
Puerto Rico, at 1.86 million current LCU per square kilometre against 1.61 million current LCU per square kilometre in Austria as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre between Austria and Puerto Rico?
255,530 current LCU per square kilometre, with Puerto Rico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Puerto Rico?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Austria and Puerto Rico rank globally for gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Austria ranks 91st and Puerto Rico ranks 88th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Puerto Rico: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/austria/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/austria/puerto-rico-us/">Austria vs Puerto Rico: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 8,168 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross domestic savings (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.