Argentina vs Congo: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre

Argentina
12.70 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo
11.65 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
50th
Congo rank
52nd

Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Argentina
  • Congo
05.0M10.0M15.0M196119922023

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 12.70 million current LCU per square kilometre against 11.65 million current LCU per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 1.05 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.

Argentina ranks 50th and Congo ranks 52nd of 184 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Congo Difference Ahead
1960s 0 current LCU per square kilometre 5,637 current LCU per square kilometre 5,637 current LCU per square kilometre Congo
1970s 0 current LCU per square kilometre 58,741 current LCU per square kilometre 58,741 current LCU per square kilometre Congo
1980s 27.25 current LCU per square kilometre 678,871 current LCU per square kilometre 678,844 current LCU per square kilometre Congo
1990s 15,180 current LCU per square kilometre 1.22 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.21 million current LCU per square kilometre Congo
2000s 53,286 current LCU per square kilometre 5.15 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.10 million current LCU per square kilometre Congo
2010s 458,946 current LCU per square kilometre 11.93 million current LCU per square kilometre 11.47 million current LCU per square kilometre Congo
2020s 5.89 million current LCU per square kilometre 10.82 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.93 million current LCU per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre, Argentina or Congo?
Argentina, at 12.70 million current LCU per square kilometre against 11.65 million current LCU per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre between Argentina and Congo?
1.05 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Congo?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Congo rank globally for gross domestic savings (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Argentina ranks 50th and Congo ranks 52nd of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Congo: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/argentina/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-domestic-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/argentina/congo-rep/">Argentina vs Congo: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
184 places, 8,168 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross domestic savings (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.