Jordan vs Tajikistan: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per capita
Jordan
-128.95 current LCU per person
in 2007
Tajikistan
-582.66 current LCU per person
in 2024
Jordan rank
159th
Tajikistan rank
162nd
Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per capita over time
- Jordan
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports -128.95 current LCU per person against -582.66 current LCU per person in Tajikistan, a difference of 453.71 current LCU per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 159th and Tajikistan ranks 162nd of 187 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 1 and Tajikistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 60.02 current LCU per person | 12.22 current LCU per person | 47.8 current LCU per person | Jordan |
| 2000s | -56.94 current LCU per person | -19.71 current LCU per person | 37.24 current LCU per person | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross domestic savings (current lcu), per capita, Jordan or Tajikistan?
- Jordan, at -128.95 current LCU per person against -582.66 current LCU per person in Tajikistan as of 2007.
- What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current lcu), per capita between Jordan and Tajikistan?
- 453.71 current LCU per person, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Tajikistan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2007.
- How do Jordan and Tajikistan rank globally for gross domestic savings (current lcu), per capita?
- Jordan ranks 159th and Tajikistan ranks 162nd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic savings (current LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.