Eswatini vs Peru: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per capita
Eswatini
10,744 current LCU per person
in 2024
Peru
9,833 current LCU per person
in 2025
Eswatini rank
111th
Peru rank
114th
Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per capita over time
- Eswatini
- Peru
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 10,744 current LCU per person against 9,833 current LCU per person in Peru, a difference of 911 current LCU per person.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 111th and Peru ranks 114th of 187 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 8,320 current LCU per person | 4,757 current LCU per person | 3,563 current LCU per person | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 11,376 current LCU per person | 6,498 current LCU per person | 4,878 current LCU per person | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross domestic savings (current lcu), per capita, Eswatini or Peru?
- Eswatini, at 10,744 current LCU per person against 9,833 current LCU per person in Peru as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current lcu), per capita between Eswatini and Peru?
- 911 current LCU per person, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Peru?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Peru rank globally for gross domestic savings (current lcu), per capita?
- Eswatini ranks 111th and Peru ranks 114th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic savings (current LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.