Eritrea vs Lesotho: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per capita
Eritrea
-2,625 current LCU per person
in 2011
Lesotho
-6,466 current LCU per person
in 2025
Eritrea rank
171st
Lesotho rank
173rd
Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per capita over time
- Eritrea
- Lesotho
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports -2,625 current LCU per person against -6,466 current LCU per person in Lesotho, a difference of 3,841 current LCU per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 171st and Lesotho ranks 173rd of 187 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and Lesotho in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -798.45 current LCU per person | -2,320 current LCU per person | 1,521 current LCU per person | Eritrea |
| 2010s | -3,201 current LCU per person | -2,765 current LCU per person | 436.22 current LCU per person | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross domestic savings (current lcu), per capita, Eritrea or Lesotho?
- Eritrea, at -2,625 current LCU per person against -6,466 current LCU per person in Lesotho as of 2011.
- What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current lcu), per capita between Eritrea and Lesotho?
- 3,841 current LCU per person, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Lesotho?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2011.
- How do Eritrea and Lesotho rank globally for gross domestic savings (current lcu), per capita?
- Eritrea ranks 171st and Lesotho ranks 173rd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic savings (current LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.