Cuba vs Malawi: Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per capita
Cuba
-15,519 current LCU per person
in 2024
Malawi
-27,842 current LCU per person
in 2025
Cuba rank
179th
Malawi rank
181st
Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per capita over time
- Cuba
- Malawi
How they compare
Cuba currently reports -15,519 current LCU per person against -27,842 current LCU per person in Malawi, a difference of 12,323 current LCU per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Malawi ahead.
Cuba ranks 179th and Malawi ranks 181st of 187 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1,197 current LCU per person | 13,218 current LCU per person | 12,021 current LCU per person | Malawi |
| 2020s | -2,134 current LCU per person | -19,875 current LCU per person | 17,741 current LCU per person | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross domestic savings (current lcu), per capita, Cuba or Malawi?
- Cuba, at -15,519 current LCU per person against -27,842 current LCU per person in Malawi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross domestic savings (current lcu), per capita between Cuba and Malawi?
- 12,323 current LCU per person, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Malawi?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Malawi rank globally for gross domestic savings (current lcu), per capita?
- Cuba ranks 179th and Malawi ranks 181st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross domestic savings (current LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross domestic savings (current LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.